Pin The Tail On the Folksonomy!!
What do you get when you combine the word
'folk' to the word ‘taxonomy?’ Wow!!! You are such a genius. Yes, that’s right you’d get the word folksonomy. There has been recent talk of the nature of folksonomy, what is it? And whatever it is, will it work to benefit me, my aunt or even my pet hamster? (I was joking about the hamster). Or, is it just some ridiculous word constructed by a bow-tie wearing Harvard graduate who tends to make shit up in order to sound smart? Ok. Enough on the bashing, let’s get down to business. What exactly is folksonomy?
Folksonomy is actually derived from the anthropological study of “folk taxonomies” that became popular in the 60’s. Dr. Alfred Rosenberger defines folk taxonomy as “not only the historical root of modern biological classification, it is also crucially important to modern research scientists, who often rely on traditional knowledge when investigating native species.” In other words, folk taxonomy is a method that’s used to classify species. Get that? So, a couple years ago a blogger named Thomas Vander Wal (I shall call him T-Wal) decided to steal this classification concept and apply it to the tagging and classification systems that are used by many social networking systems on the internet.
Side Note- Just to clear things up, I have no idea if T-Wal is really a Harvard alum. I don’t know if the guy has ever been to Massachusetts. However, by the sound of his name I have a hunch that he does wear clip on bow-ties.
Anyway, getting back to folksonomy. Folksonomy therefore represents a certain social classification of data. Because there is so much information streaming through the Web, it is vital for this information to be categorized systematically. A systemized plan in organizing this data cuts significant time in the research process. In this method of info classification, people obtain the freedom to express language in the manner they want making certain words of the language entirely unique to them. I really enjoyed my friend Danielle’s example of the “muumuu” to describe a word that classifies a particular looking shirt. With out Danielle telling me (mainly because I see her wearing a muumuu all the time), I can already associate her definition of a “muumuu” and can therefore use it to categorize similar info into a group or context.
To be honest, I don’t really know what the future of folksonomy will bring. There is a possibility that it could disorganize the already disorganized information that we receive through the Web. This would suck. I hope there is a thriving future for folksonomies. I wish people knew more about them so we can see where it could all head. Mainly, I hope it cuts out at least five minutes to the obsessive hours I spend researching ridiculous topics on the Web.
'folk' to the word ‘taxonomy?’ Wow!!! You are such a genius. Yes, that’s right you’d get the word folksonomy. There has been recent talk of the nature of folksonomy, what is it? And whatever it is, will it work to benefit me, my aunt or even my pet hamster? (I was joking about the hamster). Or, is it just some ridiculous word constructed by a bow-tie wearing Harvard graduate who tends to make shit up in order to sound smart? Ok. Enough on the bashing, let’s get down to business. What exactly is folksonomy?
Folksonomy is actually derived from the anthropological study of “folk taxonomies” that became popular in the 60’s. Dr. Alfred Rosenberger defines folk taxonomy as “not only the historical root of modern biological classification, it is also crucially important to modern research scientists, who often rely on traditional knowledge when investigating native species.” In other words, folk taxonomy is a method that’s used to classify species. Get that? So, a couple years ago a blogger named Thomas Vander Wal (I shall call him T-Wal) decided to steal this classification concept and apply it to the tagging and classification systems that are used by many social networking systems on the internet.
Side Note- Just to clear things up, I have no idea if T-Wal is really a Harvard alum. I don’t know if the guy has ever been to Massachusetts. However, by the sound of his name I have a hunch that he does wear clip on bow-ties.
Anyway, getting back to folksonomy. Folksonomy therefore represents a certain social classification of data. Because there is so much information streaming through the Web, it is vital for this information to be categorized systematically. A systemized plan in organizing this data cuts significant time in the research process. In this method of info classification, people obtain the freedom to express language in the manner they want making certain words of the language entirely unique to them. I really enjoyed my friend Danielle’s example of the “muumuu” to describe a word that classifies a particular looking shirt. With out Danielle telling me (mainly because I see her wearing a muumuu all the time), I can already associate her definition of a “muumuu” and can therefore use it to categorize similar info into a group or context.
To be honest, I don’t really know what the future of folksonomy will bring. There is a possibility that it could disorganize the already disorganized information that we receive through the Web. This would suck. I hope there is a thriving future for folksonomies. I wish people knew more about them so we can see where it could all head. Mainly, I hope it cuts out at least five minutes to the obsessive hours I spend researching ridiculous topics on the Web.

